By
Sasha Russell, Communications Program Specialist, Massachusetts Council on
Compulsive Gambling
On Thursday, September 19,
2013, the Council and the Massachusetts Partnership on Responsible Gambling
presented a legislative briefing, in the Member’s Lounge of the State House, to
share the results of the Massachusetts Statewide Gambling Behavior, Opinions,
and Needs Assessment, which was conducted through a representative online
panel.
The briefing was sponsored by
House and Senate Chairs of the Joint Committee on Mental Health and Substance
Abuse, Representative Elizabeth A. Malia (D-Jamaica Plain, Eleventh Suffolk)
and Senator Joan B. Lovely (D-Salem, Second Essex). The survey gives an
overview of gambling behaviors across the Commonwealth, as well as the opinions
of Mass. residents on gambling and expanded gambling. The information will be
used by the Massachusetts Council on Compulsive Gambling to: identify needs,
and help guide program development, education efforts, treatment, referral,
family support, marketing, and advocacy. About 50 legislatures and staff
members were in attendance, as well as several media outlets.
For Communications Specialist,
Sasha C. Russell, and the Communications Interns, Thalia Yunen and Sean
Crowley, this event was a first-time experience. Russell noted, “It was great
to see so many legislatures and staff members come out to learn and show
support for the Mass. Council, and our efforts. They play such an important
role in the State, and with our organization. Without their support, and
willingness to listen, we wouldn’t be able to accomplish as much as we do.
Hopefully after listening to and looking over the assessment results, the
support will be stronger, and we’ll be able to achieve so much more.”
Crowley agreed, and recognized
that this is an important and exciting time in terms of expanding and building
capacity for those experiencing problems with gambling, and their loved ones.
“The results,” said Crowley, “Are important and relevant to the future of
expanded gambling in Massachusetts.”
Research and Data Director,
Phil Kopel, was the lead researcher for the report. The report’s abstract reads:
With the legalization of casinos,
large-scale legal gambling in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is about to
radically change. The introduction of up to four casino-resorts in
Massachusetts, a state which has the most lucrative lottery system in the
country, will likely generate significant social and economic changes. In
order to mitigate any negative effects in the future, it is necessary to
understand the current level of gambling behavior within the Commonwealth… This
study examines current gambling behavior and attitudes towards a variety of
legal and illegal gambling activities across these gambler groups, will
identify problem gambling issues, and serves as a needs assessment.
Findings include:
·
Males are significantly
more likely to be Problem and Probable Pathological gamblers than females.
·
Those in the 25 to 34
age group appear more likely to be higher-risk gamblers, 50 -64 years olds are
more likely to be social gamblers and those 65+ are the least likely to be
Probable Pathological.
·
White non-Hispanic
and Black populations appear to have similar prevalence by gambler types.
·
Asians are
significantly less likely to gamble in comparison to the general
population. However, among those who do,
they are significantly more likely to be Probable Pathological gamblers in
comparison to the state average. (The
Asian population is very diverse across nationalities, languages, geography and
education).
·
The Latino population
appears to have a significantly lower rate of gamblers, and those who do gamble
appear more likely to be Social gamblers than the general population. (This study obtained a relatively small
sample of the Latino population (6.0% surveyed identified as Hispanic vs. 16.1%
Census in Massachusetts).
·
Problem and Probable
Pathological gamblers show no significant household income distribution
differences than Social gamblers.
·
Probable Pathological
Gamblers are somewhat more likely to have a high school education or less.
Non-gamblers are more likely to have a graduate degree than the state average.
·
Approximately 4% of
those classified as Social gamblers stated that they never gambled, indicating
that they do not see playing the lottery as gambling.
·
As many as 69% of
Probable Pathological gamblers and 47% of Problem gamblers have at least one
other person in their life who has had a gambling problem. Comparatively, about
26% of Social gamblers have at least one other person in their life who has had
a gambling problem.
·
Probable Pathological
gamblers often have a variety of self-destructive behaviors. Problem gamblers have far fewer
self-destructive factors than Probable Pathological gamblers.. Yet as many as 75% of Problem gamblers stated
that they have gambled more than intended, and 69% felt guilty about their
gambling on occasion.
·
As many as 48% of
Probable Pathological gamblers and 13% of Problem gamblers have borrowed money
to pay gambling debts, compared with 0% of those classified as Social gamblers.
·
More than one-half of
Probable Pathological gamblers identified having at least one other problem
behavior. 31% have had a drug problem,
24% have had an alcohol problem, 17% have had a sex addiction problem, 6% have
had a problem stealing, and 4% have shoplifted.
All of these problem behaviors are significantly higher than the other
gambling classifications.
·
A majority of
Probable Pathological gamblers are late paying bills, smoke cigarettes, feel
depressed or hopeless, lack self-confidence or feel bad about themselves, and
are generally dissatisfied with life. In
addition, many of them also have difficulties managing their responsibilities
at home, drink alcohol to excess, regularly speed when driving, and abuse
drugs.
·
Social gamblers have
a higher prevalence of cigarette smoking than Non-gamblers. However, they have a lower prevalence of
depression and dissatisfaction with life and a higher rate of self-confidence
than Non-gamblers.
·
A higher percent of
Probable Pathological gamblers indicated that they had a strong education with
respect to owning a bank account compared with Social gamblers. However, just 62% of Probable Pathological
gamblers say they generally live within their means. This is significantly lower than the 78% of
Problem gamblers, 87% of Social gamblers and 84% of Non-gamblers who say they
generally live within their means.
·
A higher percentage of Probable Pathological gamblers
indicated receiving more education about the likelihood of losing money at a
casino compared with Social and Problem gamblers. However, there appears to be
a high correlation between Problem gamblers, and their loved ones, with problem
gambling behavior and comorbidity issues as more prominent factors than just
financial literacy.
The information in the report will be used by the
Massachusetts Council on Compulsive Gambling to grow capacity, specifically:
identify needs, and help guide program development, education efforts,
treatment, referral, family support, marketing, and advocacy.


